對(dui)(dui)于(yu)必須進行招(zhao)標的(de)勞(lao)務(wu)分包(bao)工程(cheng)(cheng)，合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)雙方(fang)(fang)為了(le)規避建設(she)行政(zheng)主(zhu)管(guan)機關對(dui)(dui)于(yu)中標合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)備(bei)案審查(cha)，有時會就(jiu)一項勞(lao)務(wu)分包(bao)工程(cheng)(cheng)簽訂實質內容不(bu)同(tong)(tong)(tong)的(de)“黑(hei)白(bai)(bai)”兩份合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong);黑(hei)合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)用于(yu)實際履行，白(bai)(bai)合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)用于(yu)備(bei)案審查(cha)。黑(hei)白(bai)(bai)兩份合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)通常在合(he)同(tong)(tong)(tong)價(jia)欲、支付方(fang)(fang)式、工期、勞(lao)務(wu)作業質最(zui)標準等方(fang)(fang)面存在明顯差異。

　　在這種情(qing)況(kuang)下(xia)，合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)雙方在進行工(gong)程結(jie)(jie)算時(shi)(shi)有時(shi)(shi)會因(yin)合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)依據的確定而發生爭(zheng)議，一般(ban)悄(qiao)況(kuang)下(xia)，勞務作業承(cheng)包(bao)人會主張(zhang)合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)價款高的白合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)為工(gong)程結(jie)(jie)算依據。勞務作業發包(bao)人會主張(zhang)合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)價款低且(qie)實際履行的黑合(he)(he)同(tong)(tong)為工(gong)程結(jie)(jie)算依據。

　　勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)分包中(zhong)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)爭(zheng)議糾紛是指發生(sheng)在勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)分包過程中(zhong)的(de)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)者和(he)用(yong)(yong)人單位(包括勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作業(ye)(ye)發包人和(he)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作業(ye)(ye)承包人)就勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)權利(li)和(he)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)義務(wu)關系所(suo)產生(sheng)的(de)爭(zheng)議。勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)分包中(zhong)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)爭(zheng)議主要有兩種(zhong)(zhong)類型，一(yi)種(zhong)(zhong)是勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)者主張用(yong)(yong)人單位支付勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)報酬;一(yi)種(zhong)(zhong)是勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)(dong)者主張用(yong)(yong)人單位承擔(dan)工傷賠償(chang)責任。

　　上述兩種勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動爭議糾(jiu)紛(fen)大量產生的直接原因是(shi)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)分包(bao)(bao)(bao)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)中(zhong)的勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動者(zhe)與(yu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)發(fa)包(bao)(bao)(bao)人或(huo)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)承包(bao)(bao)(bao)人之間沒(mei)有簽訂(ding)書(shu)面的勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動合同(tong)。勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動者(zhe)主(zhu)張與(yu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)發(fa)包(bao)(bao)(bao)人或(huo)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)承包(bao)(bao)(bao)人之間存在勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動關(guan)系，而勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)發(fa)包(bao)(bao)(bao)人或(huo)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)(ye)承包(bao)(bao)(bao)人否(fou)認與(yu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動者(zhe)存在勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動關(guan)系。

　　（一）勞動(dong)者(zhe)主(zhu)殊勞務(wu)作業發包人(ren)(ren)或勞務(wu)作業承包人(ren)(ren)支(zhi)付勞動(dong)報(bao)酬。

　　這種(zhong)勞動爭議主(zhu)耍是由(you)以(yi)下兩種(zhong)原因造成的:

　　第一、重慶勞務作(zuo)業(ye)發(fa)包人(ren)(ren)為(wei)了降低(di)用(yong)工成本選擇與(yu)不具備用(yong)人(ren)(ren)資格的(de)施工隊伍的(de)負(fu)賈人(ren)(ren)(俗稱“包工頭，)簽訂勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)分包合同(tong).在勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)發(fa)包人(ren)(ren)有按時(shi)向“包工頭”支(zhi)(zhi)付(fu)(fu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)費(fei)用(yong)時(shi).或者雖然勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)發(fa)包人(ren)(ren)按時(shi)支(zhi)(zhi)付(fu)(fu)了勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)費(fei)用(yong)但“包工頭”由于其(qi)他原因沒(mei)有按時(shi)向勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)者支(zhi)(zhi)付(fu)(fu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)報(bao)酬時(shi)，勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)者就會(hui)主張其(qi)與(yu)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)發(fa)包人(ren)(ren)存在勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)關系并向勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)(wu)(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)發(fa)包人(ren)(ren)索要勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)報(bao)酬.從(cong)而(er)發(fa)生勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動(dong)爭議(yi)。

　　第二、為了降低用工成本，具備勞務作業資質的勞務作業承包人選擇不直接招葬建筑工人并與其訂立勞動合同，而是選擇將勞務作業再次分包給小規模的不成建制的勞務作業班組長.由勞務作業班組長根據情況直接招葬建筑工人。這樣.當勞務作業班組長沒有自勞務作業承包人處取得勞務費用或雖然取得勞務費用但沒有按時支付給勞動者的，勞動者就會主張其與勞務作業承包人存在勞動關系并向勞務作業承包人索要勞動報酬，從而發生勞動爭議。
 

　　【案例四」2006年4月間.邵(shao)武(wu)(wu)(wu)市(shi)(shi)(shi)交通(tong)工(gong)程公(gong)司(si)向(xiang)(xiang)中(zhong)鐵十(shi)八(ba)局集(ji)團第五工(gong)程有限公(gong)司(si)(以下簡(jian)稱中(zhong)鐵十(shi)八(ba)局五公(gong)司(si))承包(bao)施(shi)工(gong)泉(quan)三高(gao)速公(gong)路QA6標(biao)段(duan)T.程.即南安市(shi)(shi)(shi)碼頭鎮晨(chen)光村路段(duan)。并在(zai)(zai)南安下設(she)項目部(bu)，委派(pai)傅(fu)志A為項目部(bu)負貴人(ren)。洛雙金(jin)、吳(wu)文(wen)建、吳(wu)洪(hong)寶(bao)、陳加強、盧(lu)文(wen)金(jin)、吳(wu)洪(hong)太、傅(fu)建清、傅(fu)建景(jing)、傅(fu)沐林(lin)等9人(ren)在(zai)(zai)邵(shao)武(wu)(wu)(wu)市(shi)(shi)(shi)交通(tong)工(gong)程公(gong)司(si)承建的泉(quan)三高(gao)速公(gong)路QA6標(biao)段(duan)施(shi)工(gong).邵(shao)武(wu)(wu)(wu)市(shi)(shi)(shi)交通(tong)工(gong)程公(gong)司(si)未向(xiang)(xiang)其支(zhi)付(fu)工(gong)資(zi).那武(wu)(wu)(wu)市(shi)(shi)(shi)交通(tong)工(gong)程公(gong)司(si)與活(huo)雙金(jin)等9人(ren)間沒有簽訂勞動(dong)合(he)同.2006年11月17口洛雙金(jin)等9人(ren)向(xiang)(xiang)南安市(shi)(shi)(shi)勞動(dong)爭議仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)委員會(hui)提出申訴(su)，請(qing)求裁(cai)(cai)決邵(shao)武(wu)(wu)(wu)市(shi)(shi)(shi)交通(tong)工(gong)程公(gong)司(si)支(zhi)工(gong)資(zi)124815元(yuan).2007年1月i,日南安市(shi)(shi)(shi)勞動(dong)爭議仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)委員會(hui)作(zuo)出[2007]南勞裁(cai)(cai)字第012號仲(zhong)裁(cai)(cai)裁(cai)(cai)決書，裁(cai)(cai)決邵(shao)武(wu)(wu)(wu)市(shi)(shi)(shi)交通(tong)工(gong)程公(gong)司(si)應向(xiang)(xiang)潘雙金(jin)等九人(ren)一次性(xing)支(zhi)付(fu)工(gong)資(zi)款(kuan).其中(zhong)洛雙金(jin)28780元(yuan)、吳(wu)文(wen)建26780元(yuan)、吳(wu)洪(hong)寶(bao)16780元(yuan)、陳加強5792元(yuan)、盧(lu)文(wen)金(jin)5978元(yuan)、吳(wu)洪(hong)太 4380元(yuan)、傅(fu)建清12480元(yuan)、傅(fu)建景(jing)10400元(yuan)、傅(fu)沐林(lin)13445元(yuan)，合(he)計124815元(yuan).

　　邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)不服上(shang)述仲裁裁決(jue).向(xiang)南(nan)安市人(ren)(ren)(ren)民法院提起訴訟稱，其(qi)將(jiang)向(xiang)中鐵十八(ba)局(ju)五公司(si)承建(jian)的(de)(de)(de)部(bu)分項目分包(bao)給李(li)勵義(yi)施(shi)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)，就此雙(shuang)(shuang)方簽訂分包(bao)合同，并向(xiang)李(li)勵義(yi)支(zhi)付相(xiang)關(guan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)款，至于李(li)勵義(yi)雇(gu)用的(de)(de)(de)人(ren)(ren)(ren)員與(yu)邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)無關(guan).勞(lao)動仲裁部(bu)門(men)的(de)(de)(de)裁決(jue)錯誤，請(qing)求(qiu)駁回洛雙(shuang)(shuang)金(jin)等(deng)g人(ren)(ren)(ren)要求(qiu)邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)支(zhi)付工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資的(de)(de)(de)訴訟請(qing)求(qiu)。洛雙(shuang)(shuang)金(jin)等(deng)9人(ren)(ren)(ren)答辯稱.其(qi)與(yu)邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)存在勞(lao)動關(guan)系.即使是(shi)(shi)邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)酒(jiu)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)所稱的(de)(de)(de)將(jiang)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)分包(bao).根據(ju)有關(guan)法律(lv)規定。其(qi)將(jiang)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)發包(bao)給不具備用工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)主(zhu)休資格(ge)的(de)(de)(de)組織或個人(ren)(ren)(ren)的(de)(de)(de)，也(ye)應(ying)承擔(dan)支(zhi)付工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資的(de)(de)(de)責任(ren).邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)支(zhi)付的(de)(de)(de)是(shi)(shi)計(ji)件包(bao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資，不是(shi)(shi)日工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資或月(yue)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資.南(nan)安市人(ren)(ren)(ren)民法院認為活(huo)雙(shuang)(shuang)金(jin)等(deng)9人(ren)(ren)(ren)與(yu)邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)存在事實勞(lao)動關(guan)系，駁回了邵(shao)(shao)武(wu)(wu)市交(jiao)通工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)(cheng)公司(si)的(de)(de)(de)訴訟請(qing)求(qiu)。

　　后邵武市交通工程公司不服一審法院的判決.泉州市中級人民法院提起上訴;二審法院經審理后認為洛雙金等9人沒有提供證據證明其與邵武市交通工程公司存在事實勞動關系，故判決徽銷一審判決.并駁回潘雙金、吳文建、吳洪寶、陳加強、盧文金、吳洪太、傅建清、傅建景、傅沐林關于要求邵武市交通工程建設有限公司支付工資合計124815元的請求。
 

　　之后，潘雙(shuang)金等7人(ren)(ren)向(xiang)福建省高級人(ren)(ren)民法院(yuan)申(shen)請(qing)再審(shen)(shen)，再審(shen)(shen)法院(yuan)經審(shen)(shen)理后認為申(shen)請(qing)再審(shen)(shen)人(ren)(ren)潘雙(shuang)金、吳文(wen)建、吳洪(hong)寶、陳(chen)加強、吳洪(hong)太、傅(fu)建清、傅(fu)建景等七人(ren)(ren)主(zhu)張與被申(shen)請(qing)人(ren)(ren)邵(shao)武市(shi)(shi)(shi)交(jiao)通(tong)工(gong)程公司(si)(si)間存(cun)在(zai)(zai)勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)關(guan)系(xi)(xi)(xi)，請(qing)求其(qi)支付相(xiang)關(guan)工(gong)資報(bao)(bao)酬(chou)(chou)。因雙(shuang)方未簽訂(ding)書(shu)面勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)合同，邵(shao)武市(shi)(shi)(shi)交(jiao)通(tong)工(gong)程公司(si)(si)又不認可雙(shuang)方存(cun)在(zai)(zai)勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)關(guan)系(xi)(xi)(xi)，申(shen)請(qing)再審(shen)(shen)人(ren)(ren)在(zai)(zai)勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)仲裁(cai)及(ji)訴訟(song)(song)中(zhong)所(suo)提(ti)供(gong)的(de)證據，其(qi)中(zhong)仲裁(cai)中(zhong)提(ti)供(gong)的(de)《拖欠(qian)克扣(kou)員工(gong)工(gong)資登記表》、《事(shi)實(shi)理由及(ji)計算數(shu)量，系(xi)(xi)(xi)其(qi)單方制作(zuo);一審(shen)(shen)訴訟(song)(song)中(zhong)提(ti)供(gong)的(de)南安(an)市(shi)(shi)(shi)勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)和社會保障局(ju)調查(cha)(cha)傅(fu)志強的(de)調查(cha)(cha)筆(bi)錄(lu)摘(zhai)要等六份證據，沒有(you)涉及(ji)其(qi)與邵(shao)武市(shi)(shi)(shi)交(jiao)通(tong)工(gong)程公司(si)(si)或該公司(si)(si)項目負責人(ren)(ren)傅(fu)志強建立(li)勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)關(guan)系(xi)(xi)(xi)的(de)內(nei)容(rong)，也(ye)沒有(you)涉及(ji)被拖欠(qian)工(gong)程報(bao)(bao)酬(chou)(chou)的(de)相(xiang)關(guan)記載，故申(shen)請(qing)再審(shen)(shen)人(ren)(ren)主(zhu)張其(qi)與邵(shao)武市(shi)(shi)(shi)交(jiao)通(tong)工(gong)程公司(si)(si)存(cun)在(zai)(zai)勞動(dong)(dong)(dong)關(guan)系(xi)(xi)(xi)及(ji)其(qi)請(qing)求支付工(gong)資報(bao)(bao)酬(chou)(chou)，缺乏事(shi)實(shi)和法律依據，其(qi)依法應承(cheng)擔舉證不能(neng)的(de)法律后果。

　　生效判決駁回(hui)其提(ti)出(chu)(chu)邵(shao)(shao)武市交(jiao)通(tong)(tong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程公(gong)(gong)司(si)支(zhi)付(fu)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)的(de)訴(su)訟請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)正確。勞(lao)動者(zhe)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)用(yong)人(ren)單位支(zhi)付(fu)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)訴(su)訟請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)的(de)實現，依(yi)法(fa)應當(dang)具備勞(lao)動關系成(cheng)立及其具體工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)數(shu)額兩(liang)方面(mian)的(de)事實要件。本案(an)中.邵(shao)(shao)武市交(jiao)通(tong)(tong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程公(gong)(gong)司(si)對勞(lao)動仲(zhong)裁(cai)裁(cai)決不(bu)(bu)服提(ti)起(qi)訴(su)訟，主張(zhang)其與申(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)再(zai)審(shen)人(ren)間不(bu)(bu)存(cun)在勞(lao)動關系，請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)法(fa)院駁回(hui)包括七位申(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)再(zai)審(shen)人(ren)在內的(de)潘雙金等九人(ren)提(ti)出(chu)(chu)支(zhi)付(fu)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)的(de)訴(su)訟請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)。因申(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)再(zai)審(shen)人(ren)提(ti)供(gong)的(de)證(zheng)據(ju)(ju)不(bu)(bu)足以(yi)證(zheng)明其與邵(shao)(shao)武市交(jiao)通(tong)(tong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程公(gong)(gong)司(si)間存(cun)在勞(lao)動關系，本案(an)不(bu)(bu)具備支(zhi)付(fu)相(xiang)關工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)訴(su)訟請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)的(de)實現條件，故(gu)申(shen)請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)再(zai)審(shen)人(ren)以(yi)邵(shao)(shao)武市交(jiao)通(tong)(tong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)程公(gong)(gong)司(si)對其請(qing)(qing)(qing)(qing)求(qiu)支(zhi)付(fu)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)數(shu)額沒有異議(yi)為(wei)由，主張(zhang)生效判決確定其對工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資(zi)(zi)(zi)數(shu)額負(fu)舉(ju)證(zheng)責任并據(ju)(ju)此進行(xing)改(gai)判錯誤，依(yi)據(ju)(ju)不(bu)(bu)足，不(bu)(bu)予(yu)支(zhi)持。