發布(bu)日期:2017-02-21 15:56:26 瀏覽(lan)次數:1874
勞(lao)(lao)動者主(zhu)張勞(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)發包人(ren)(ren)或勞(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)(zuo)業(ye)承包人(ren)(ren)承擔工(gong)傷賠償責任(ren)。
眾所周知(zhi),建筑(zhu)行(xing)業(ye)是一個工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)發(fa)生幾率很高的行(xing)業(ye)。所以《建筑(zhu)法》第(di)四十八條規定:“建筑(zhu)施工(gong)企業(ye)應當依法為職(zhi)工(gong)參(can)加工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)繳納工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)費。鼓勵企業(ye)為從(cong)事(shi)危險(xian)(xian)(xian)作業(ye)的職(zhi)工(gong)辦理憊外傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)害保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian),支付保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)費。”雖然(ran)有(you)上(shang)述法律規定,但還是有(you)很多從(cong)事(shi)建筑(zhu)業(ye)的勞(lao)動者(zhe)沒(mei)有(you)參(can)加工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)。當發(fa)生工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)事(shi)故時,受到人身(shen)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)害的勞(lao)動者(zhe)就無法根據《工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)條例(li)》從(cong)工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)基金中享受各種工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)保(bao)險(xian)(xian)(xian)待遇。勞(lao)動者(zhe)為了維護自(zi)身(shen)的合法權益(yi)只(zhi)能(neng)要求(qiu)用人單位(wei)承擔工(gong)傷(shang)(shang)(shang)(shang)賠償(chang)貴任(ren)。此類勞(lao)動爭議的發(fa)生主(zhu)張基于以下三種情(qing)況:
第一、具有重慶勞務作業資質的(de)勞(lao)務作業承包人(ren)怠于(yu)履行為(wei)勞(lao)動者參(can)加工(gong)傷保險的(de)義務.從而在工(gong)傷事故發(fa)生后導致該等糾紛的(de)發(fa)生。
第二、勞(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)(ye)發包(bao)人為(wei)了(le)降低用工(gong)(gong)成(cheng)本將勞(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)(ye)發包(bao)給不(bu)(bu)具(ju)(ju)備用工(gong)(gong)主體資格的組織(zhi)或自(zi)然(ran)人并與之簽訂勞(lao)務(wu)分包(bao)合同(tong)。該(gai)等(deng)組織(zhi)和自(zi)然(ran)人由(you)于不(bu)(bu)具(ju)(ju)備用工(gong)(gong)資格而無法為(wei)勞(lao)動者參加(jia)工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)保險,從而在(zai)工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)事(shi)故發生(sheng)后產生(sheng)糾(jiu)紛。
第三、為了(le)降低用工(gong)(gong)成本(ben),具備(bei)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)資(zi)(zi)質的(de)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)承包(bao)人(ren)(ren)不直接招(zhao)芬建(jian)筑(zhu)工(gong)(gong)人(ren)(ren)并與其(qi)訂立勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動合同,而是選擇將勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)再次分包(bao)給小規(gui)模的(de)不成建(jian)制的(de)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)班組長(chang),由勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)班組長(chang)根據情況直接招(zhao)募建(jian)筑(zhu)工(gong)(gong)人(ren)(ren)。在這(zhe)種悄況下,不具備(bei)用人(ren)(ren)資(zi)(zi)格的(de)勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)中JJF織長(chang)當然無法給勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動者(zhe)參加工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)保(bao)險(xian),勞(lao)(lao)(lao)務(wu)作(zuo)業(ye)承包(bao)人(ren)(ren)也(ye)不給勞(lao)(lao)(lao)動者(zhe)參加工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)保(bao)險(xian),一(yi)且工(gong)(gong)傷(shang)事故發生,極易(yi)因賠(pei)償問題(ti)產(chan)生糾紛。
〔案例五〕原告平(ping)(ping)頂(ding)山市正旺(wang)建(jian)筑勞務分包(bao)(bao)有限公司將其(qi)承包(bao)(bao)的(de)平(ping)(ping)頂(ding)山工(gong)(gong)業職業技術學院東校(xiao)區標12號(hao)(hao)、16號(hao)(hao)公寓(yu)樓(lou)工(gong)(gong)程發(fa)包(bao)(bao)給(gei)無(wu)用工(gong)(gong)主體資(zi)格的(de)自然人李克(ke)亮(liang)。秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)在(zai)(zai)李克(ke)亮(liang)承包(bao)(bao)的(de)工(gong)(gong)地上工(gong)(gong)作,雙方未簽訂勞動合同(tong),未參加工(gong)(gong)傷保(bao)險。2009年(nian)4月(yue)29上午,秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)在(zai)(zai)工(gong)(gong)地支模(mo)(mo)板時.因手扶固定(ding)模(mo)(mo)板的(de)鋼筋從墻體脫(tuo)落。秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)從墻上摔下致傷。隨即(ji)秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)被送往(wang)中國人民(min)解放軍第152中心醫(yi)院治療(liao).2009年(nian)5月(yue)26日(ri)出院,住院27天.共發(fa)生(sheng)醫(yi)療(liao)費(fei)29451. 19元,李克(ke)亮(liang)支付醫(yi)療(liao)費(fei)28451.19元.秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)墊付1000元。2009年(nian)7月(yue)6日(ri)湛(zhan)河區人事勞動和社會保(bao)障局認定(ding)秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)所受傷害為工(gong)(gong)傷。2009年(nian)11月(yue)10日(ri)平(ping)(ping)頂(ding)山市勞動能力(li)鑒(jian)定(ding)委員(yuan)會鑒(jian)定(ding)秦(qin)(qin)(qin)朝(chao)(chao)民(min)傷殘等級(ji)為八級(ji)。
此后(hou)(hou),秦朝民(min)(min)作(zuo)(zuo)為(wei)申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren),正(zheng)旺(wang)勞(lao)務(wu)分包公司(si)作(zuo)(zuo)為(wei)被(bei)申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren),申(shen)請(qing)(qing)勞(lao)動仲裁(cai)。201。年4月(yue)14日(ri)平頂山市湛河(he)區勞(lao)動爭議仲裁(cai)委員會作(zuo)(zuo)出(chu)仲裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue):一、被(bei)申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren)支(zhi)(zhi)付申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren)住院期間由申(shen)訴(su)人(ren)墊支(zhi)(zhi)的醫療(liao)費(fei)1000元(yuan)(yuan),住院期間伙食補(bu)(bu)助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)費(fei)30元(yuan)(yuan)X70%X27(天)=567元(yuan)(yuan)。二、被(bei)申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren)支(zhi)(zhi)付申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren)停工留薪期間工資福利(li)待遇:1305元(yuan)(yuan)X6.3(個(ge)月(yue))=8221.5元(yuan)(yuan)。三、被(bei)申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren)支(zhi)(zhi)付申(shen)請(qing)(qing)人(ren)一次(ci)性傷(shang)(shang)殘補(bu)(bu)助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)金(jin)1305元(yuan)(yuan)X10(個(ge)月(yue))=13050元(yuan)(yuan),一次(ci)性工傷(shang)(shang)醫療(liao)補(bu)(bu)助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)金(jin):2083元(yuan)(yuan)X10(個(ge)月(yue))二20830元(yuan)(yuan)。一次(ci)性傷(shang)(shang)殘就業補(bu)(bu)助(zhu)(zhu)(zhu)金(jin):2083 X 26(個(ge)月(yue))=54158元(yuan)(yuan)。以(yi)上各項工傷(shang)(shang)保險(xian)待遇共計97826.5元(yuan)(yuan)。后(hou)(hou)平頂山市正(zheng)旺(wang)建筑勞(lao)務(wu)分包有限公司(si)不服仲裁(cai)裁(cai)決(jue),向人(ren)民(min)(min)法院提起訴(su)訟。
本案一(yi)審(shen)(shen)法(fa)(fa)院平頂(ding)(ding)山市(shi)湛河區(qu)人(ren)民法(fa)(fa)院和二審(shen)(shen)法(fa)(fa)院平頂(ding)(ding)山市(shi)中(zhong)級人(ren)民法(fa)(fa)院經審(shen)(shen)理(li)均(jun)認為:湛河區(qu)勞(lao)(lao)動爭議仲裁委員會仲裁裁決書認定事實(shi)清楚,適用(yong)(yong)(yong)法(fa)(fa)律正確,處理(li)并無(wu)不妥。平頂(ding)(ding)山市(shi)正旺建筑務分(fen)(fen)包(bao)公司將工(gong)程分(fen)(fen)包(bao)給(gei)不具(ju)(ju)備用(yong)(yong)(yong)工(gong)主(zhu)體資格(ge)的(de)(de)自然(ran)人(ren)李克亮,李克亮招用(yong)(yong)(yong)的(de)(de)勞(lao)(lao)動者秦朝民在(zai)勞(lao)(lao)動過程中(zhong)受傷,正旺勞(lao)(lao)務分(fen)(fen)包(bao)公司應當承(cheng)擔相應的(de)(de)法(fa)(fa)律責(ze)任(ren)。正旺勞(lao)(lao)務分(fen)(fen)包(bao)公司辯稱秦朝民與其沒有(you)任(ren)何關(guan)系(xi),故(gu)不應判(pan)決其承(cheng)擔賠償資任(ren)。根(gen)據法(fa)(fa)律規定,用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)單位將業務發包(bao)、轉包(bao)、分(fen)(fen)包(bao)給(gei)不具(ju)(ju)備用(yong)(yong)(yong)工(gong)主(zhu)體資格(ge)的(de)(de)組織或(huo)個(ge)人(ren),不具(ju)(ju)備用(yong)(yong)(yong)工(gong)主(zhu)體資格(ge)的(de)(de)組織或(huo)個(ge)人(ren)招用(yong)(yong)(yong)的(de)(de)勞(lao)(lao)動者因(yin)工(gong)作原因(yin)遭受事故(gu)傷害(hai)或(huo)患職業病的(de)(de),由(you)(you)用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)單位承(cheng)擔工(gong)傷保險責(ze)任(ren)。故(gu)正旺勞(lao)(lao)務分(fen)(fen)包(bao)公司的(de)(de)抗(kang)辯理(li)由(you)(you)不能成立。